In 1856, the Xhosa had a serious problem. They had been defeated in many wars and had lost a lot of their ancestral lands. They faced the complete extinction of their culture and way of life at the hands of European colonists. So how did they deal with this serious and seemingly insurmountable problem?
They listened to a man named Mhlakaza who claimed that his niece was prophetess. According to the pair (I put most of blame on Mhlakaza), if the Xhosa killed all their cattle and destroyed all of their food then God would cause an army of Russians to rise out of the sea and destroy the British. The Xhosa people faithfully followed “God’s” commands.
The resulting famine destroyed the Xhosa as an independent culture. The entire people were reduced to servitude to the very British that were supposed to be driven into the sea by the ghostly Russian armies.
You could argue that this would have happened in any case. After all, the whole reason the Xhosa were so receptive to those prophecies in the first place was because their backs were to the wall. But you can hardly argue that Mhlakaza helped the Xhosa by peddling his delusions.
We like to think that we are above all that kind of stuff now. We would like to think that we are more rational. But I don’t see much difference between the solution that Mhlakaza offered the Xhosa and the solutions that are being offered for global warming.
We are told by many that should be in a position to know that global warming is a very serious problem that threatens us all. We are told that our backs are to the wall and we have no time to waste. Yet the solution they are pushing for is nothing but a change in the terms of trade between rich countries and developing nations. Needless to say, changing the terms of trade will do nothing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
(more…)