Over at my Ape Man blog, I have discussed New Urbanism on occasion (largely because I read Architecture + Morality and I sometimes desire to contribute to the discussion). I am generally sympathetic to the aesthetics of New Urbanism, but I doubt current American values will ever enable it to work.
I am not happy about that. If cities conformed more to the ideals that inform New Urbanism, I might not mind visiting them as much as I do now. I say that not because there is any currently built example of New Urbanism that really impresses me. Rather, I have sympathy with New Urbanism because there are many examples of Old Urbanism that I admire.
One such example of Old Urbanism that I admire would be Ponte Vecchio bridge in Florence.
The picture above really isn’t big enough for you to really appreciate it. So I recommend that you go to G|o®g|O’s Flickr page and look at the picture in its original size.
One of the first things that you will notice about the bridge is that it has houses built on it (actually they are shops, but we will get to that in a bit). The second thing you will notice is that there is a causeway that runs across the top of the bridge. If you are observant, you will also pick up on the fact that bridge is old. Very old in fact.
According to Wikipedia,
Believed to have been first built in Roman times,[2] it was originally made of wood. After being destroyed by a flood in 1333[2] (save two of its central piers, as noted by Giovanni Villani)[3] it was rebuilt in 1345,[4] this time in stone. Most of the design is attributed to Taddeo Gaddi.[5] The bridge consists of three segmental arches, the main arch has a span of 30 meters (98 feet) the two side arches each span 27 meters (88 feet). The rise of the arches is between 3.5 and 4.4 meters (11½ to 14½ feet), and the span-to-rise ratio 5:1.[6]
It has always hosted shops and merchants (legend says this was originally due to a tax exemption), which displayed their goods on tables after authorization of the Bargello (a sort of a lord mayor, a magistrate and a police authority).
Although the Wikipedia article would lead you to believe that people set up shops on the bridge for tax reasons, I strongly suspect that there were more practical reasons. The earliest shopkeepers on the bridge seem to have been primarily butchers up until the time the Cosimo I de’ Medici drove them off. I suspect that butchers found it handy to be able to throw their waste products in the water. The government of Florence may have originally felt that this was desirable from the standpoint of public health and hence the tax breaks.
Regardless of the reasons for why it was built the way it was built, I find it impressive that a structure in heavy use has lasted so long. To me, this is the ultimate testimony to a good design.
In the picture above, you can see some of the design details a little better. Although, again, I would recommend that you go to mandydale’s flicker site and see the picture in its original size.
I wonder if those square holes that you see at the bridge were put there to accommodate the original scaffolding. I also wonder if the wood supports for the shops are original or if they have been replaced over the years. If they are original it is pretty impressive. I wonder what type of wood they could have used that would last so long in the moist environment above a river?
One thing that surprises me is the state of disrepair that some of the shops are in. You can’t see the disrepair so well in the picture above (although if you look at the original it is a little more obvious). But take a look at the one below….
You would think that a famous tourist site would be kept up a little better. Though I grant you that it would be a trick to repair the plaster on a shop hanging off the side of a bridge. Maybe they are waiting for more shops to get to the same state so they can do a bunch of them at once?
Again, if you want to see a better picture go to kandyjaxx’s Flickr page and look at the original.
As you can see from the picture above, they certainly keep the front of the shops on the bridge spiffy enough. You can go here to look at a better quality version of the picture above at tbee’s flicker site. The original on tbee’s site is so large that you can really see some of the construction details.
The picture below is also taken from the top of the bridge. Except this time you are looking down the bridge instead of across it.
Again, looking at the original picture at MenuMarco’s Flickr site will give you a better sense of the construction details.