Essay of the Week: 3/11/07-3/17/07

Many people profess to be interested in the news. Many people profess to want to know what goes on in the world. Few actually do. To actually be interested in the news you must be willing to follow complex arguments. You must also be willing to tolerate a certain degree of ambiguity.

If you are one of those people with those distressingly rare traits, then you owe it to yourself to read this essay by Stuart Staniford called A Nosedive into the Desert. In one sense, you could argue that this essay is nothing more then an exercise in punditry. It is one man’s opinion on what the available data means. But if all opinion’s were as rigorously argued as this essay is, the world would be a better place.

If you have time you might want to familiarize yourself with the context for this essay by readying Staniford’s post called Saudi Arabian oil declines 8% in 2006 and a critique of that post by Euan Mearns called Saudi Arabia and that $1000 bet. It was in response to that critique that Staniford wrote A Nosedive into the Desert. You can also read the Ape Man’s thoughts on the subject here.

But if you don’t have time to do all that reading, I think that A Nosedive into the Desert stands on its own.

Canaries in the Coal Mine

Did you know that sub-prime lenders (those that lend to people with bad credit) are dropping like flies in a cold snap? No? It is common knowledge amongst those who follow business news but it has not made the headlines yet. To get an idea of how fast this turn around was, consider this quote from this New York Times article…..

On March 1, a Wall Street analyst at Bear Stearns wrote an upbeat report on a company that specializes in making mortgages to cash-poor homebuyers. The company, New Century Financial, had already disclosed that a growing number of borrowers were defaulting, and its stock, at around $15, had lost half its value in three weeks.

What happened next seems all too familiar to investors who bought technology stocks in 2000 at the breathless urging of Wall Street analysts. Last week, New Century said it would stop making loans and needed emergency financing to survive. The stock collapsed to $3.21.

The analyst’s untimely call, coupled with a failure among other Wall Street institutions to identify problems in the home mortgage market, isn’t the only familiar ring to investors who watched the technology stock bubble burst precisely seven years ago.

New Century Financial is not the only one. Every company that made loans to poor people is having serious problems. Now an analyst at Bear Stearns is saying that….

Tougher lending standards stemming from the shakeout in the beleaguered subprime mortgage industry could prevent up to 1.1 million U.S. homebuyers from getting mortgages this year, a Bear Stearns analyst told investors on Friday.

You might wonder why you should listen to anyone from Bear Stearns. After all they were the same fools who put a buy call on New Century a week before it collapsed. In fact, there are a lot of people out there arguing that problems in the sub-prime market are no big deal. Consider this quote from the LA times….

Many economists, as well as Fed officials, say they don’t believe that sub-prime borrowers account for a big enough share of the housing market to have a dramatic effect on the economy.

Haven’t these people ever heard of canaries in the coal mine?

Bear Stearns might be off in saying that 1.1 million homebuyer will not be able to buy a home this year because of tightening lending standards, but I would not bet against them. Bear Stearns itself has a lot of its own money in the game. They are reputed to have already taken big losses. Their recent pain is what makes me think that they are now a little more grounded in reality.

But regardless of whether you trust Bear Stearns or not, it has always been conventional wisdom that problems in the sub-prime market were early warnings of coming economic problems. Why do people think that this time will be different?

There are a lot of web sites covering this unfolding story. But my favorite is Calculated Risk. They tipped me off to all of links in this story except for the New York Times article.

Rage of the Young Danes…..

Have you heard about how a thousand odd young Danes are rioting because the city of Copenhagen sold a building?

If you have, you have properly only seen it mentioned in passing. But we here at the Ethereal voice believe that picture is worth a thousand words. So take a gander at the following clips from the riots.

Before we start, let us say that we are trying very hard to be fair. To best of our knowledge, both of the videos that we are showing have been approved by the protesters themselves. We don’t want people to think that we are just trying to smear them. Here is a video showing the Danish protesters taking action against the police….

Please note that Danish protesters were using Molotov cocktails and firecrackers as well as stones throughout the riot. I am not sure how well this comes through on this video. I am not even a hundred percent sure that they were using Molotov Cocktails at this particular event. But if I understand the video rightly, they were using firecrackers.

This next clip was posted by someone sympathetic to the protesters. It purports to show the police using excessive force.

All we can say is that we were not outraged.

In case you think we are taking those videos out of context, here is an “essay” explaining the cause of the conflict in great detail. It is written by a protester.

It you want a different view of the matter, this post from the Gates of Vienna should get you started. And yes, we know the Gates of Vienna is written by a bunch of subhuman extreme right wing conservatives.

Here is another right wing post on the subject.