What happens if both the bank and a borrow walk away from a house?

From Calculated Risk and Business Week…..

Hat tip to Disempowered Paper Pusher (the backbone of our industry!) for this excellent BusinessWeek piece on homes abandoned by both borrower and lender, “Dirty Deeds.”

An anecdote with all the right motifs:

In 1998, Elizabeth M. Manuel obtained a $34,500 mortgage on the property from IMC Mortgage (since acquired by Citibank). By 2002, the loan had been sold into a securitization trust administered by Chase Manhattan (now JPMorgan Chase) as trustee. It also went into default, and Chase began foreclosure proceedings. In a court filing, Manuel (who could not be located for comment) said she left the home while the foreclosure action was pending. More than five years later, though, the title remains in her name. The house, although still standing, has become a fire-gutted wreck.

In May 2007, Nowak issued a default judgment against Chase for $9,000. But these cases can be notoriously difficult to untangle. Thomas A. Kelly, a spokesman for the bank, notes that Chase sold its trustee business to the Bank of New York Mellon (BK) in October, 2006, and couldn’t locate anyone at Chase able to comment. But he reiterates the industry view that Chase can’t be held responsible for maintaining a property it never owned. He acknowledges that if a home didn’t seem worth taking as collateral, the bank may have made a decision to “just walk away.”

Besides amusing myself by trying to figure out just what documents I’d have to give Judge Boyko to prove standing to foreclose in this case, I am of course deeply impressed by the social acceptability of “just walking away.”

A shortages that may have escaped your notice

From Cnews….

The Vancouver-based company that makes much of the world’s methanol — the main ingredient in windshield washer fluid — has had to curtail production in Chile.

The company is having trouble getting natural gas, another key ingredient, from neighbouring Argentina because the country has imposed a hefty export tax.

Methanex is now posting a price of $832 US per metric tonne, up from a low of $309 earlier this year.

In October, the company reported a severe shortage of methanol because of closed plants throughout the industry — including its own in Chile — combined with strong demand. It’s since restored some natural gas supply.

Consumers haven’t noticed the impact yet.

But retailers will soon be running out of inventory and buying — and selling — the product at new, sky-high prices, Paquette said.

And the share price went up?

Somebody should start a comedy routine with the punch line being “and the share price went up.” Sometimes the news that can cause share prices to rise can seem pretty absurd. Take Sallie Mae latest troubles for example…

Student lender Sallie Mae said Monday it raised $2.9 billion through a stock sale, the majority of which will be used to settle contracts that require the company to buy back shares at above-market prices.

and at the end of the article…..

Shares rose 36 cents, or 1.8 percent, Monday afternoon $20.01 The company’s shares had plunged last week to their lowest price since early 2001.

I know the markets were probably just relived that Sallie Mae manged to get out of those contracts as easily as it did. Still, its kind of funny when stocks rise on news like that.

Economic links to make you sick

From Naked Capitalism…

The latest policy is a regulatory change by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that says employers can reduce benefits when retirees reach age 65 and become eligible for Social Security and Medicare.

Another instance of the Bush Administration, while having come into office claiming to be a compassionate conservative and anti-large-scale government, being anything but that. This allows corporations to shift their obligations on to taxpayers, and will make it politically more difficult to implement changes in Medicare and Social Security.

From Calculated Risk….

According to the Fed, the discount rate spread is 145 bps. This graph was released this morning.

From The Age….

The depth of the housing crisis was underscored by the head of one of America’s largest banks, Bank of America, the straight-speaking Kenneth Lewis, who warned of a completely new attitude by Americans to their homes amid fears that as many as 20 million householders may “walk” from them, further deepening the crisis.

Lewis’ comments came as a new expression – “jingle mail” – referring to the growing trend where Americans mail the keys to their homes to the lenders before vacating, entered the US lexicon. Figures for November revealed more than 200,000 US homes were foreclosed, a 68% increase on November 2006.

Why America is in Trouble

Robert Folsom via Financial Armageddon…..

At the end of 2006, the financial assets of financial institutions surpassed 20% of annual GDP (those assets had never even eclipsed 5% of GDP until the early 1990s).

Since a picture is worth a thousand words, follow the link and look at the graph. It will do a much better job of communicating the dramatic nature of the change then mere words will.

If I was good with graphs, I would take the graph that Robert Folsom made and I would slap a graph of the national savings rate over it. Unless my memory is playing tricks on me, the growth of the financial assets of financial institutions matches the dramatic fall of America’s saving rate over the same period.